diff --git a/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/ClusteringColumn.java b/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/ClusteringColumn.java index a433702..0429e1f 100644 --- a/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/ClusteringColumn.java +++ b/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/ClusteringColumn.java @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ import java.lang.annotation.Target; import com.noorq.casser.mapping.OrderingDirection; /** - * @ClusteringColumn is the family column in legacy Cassandra API + * ClusteringColumn is the family column in legacy Cassandra API * * The purpose of this column is have additional dimension in the table. * Both @PartitionKey and @ClusteringColumn together are parts of the primary key of the table. diff --git a/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/StaticColumn.java b/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/StaticColumn.java index ca8267b..81405b6 100644 --- a/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/StaticColumn.java +++ b/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/StaticColumn.java @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy; import java.lang.annotation.Target; /** - * @StaticColumn annotation is using to define a static column in Cassandra Table + * StaticColumn annotation is using to define a static column in Cassandra Table * * It does not have effect in @UDT and @Tuple types and in @Table-s that does not have @ClusteringColumn-s * diff --git a/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/Types.java b/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/Types.java index 973b183..0914c8d 100644 --- a/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/Types.java +++ b/src/main/java/com/noorq/casser/mapping/annotation/Types.java @@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ public final class Types { * It supports only simple data type (not Collection, UDT or Tuple) * * In case if you need UDT sub-type in the list, consider @UDTList annotation + * + * @return data type name of the value */ DataType.Name value(); @@ -138,6 +140,8 @@ public final class Types { * It supports only simple data type (not Collection, UDT or Tuple) * * In case if you need UDT key sub-type in the map, consider @UDTKeyMap or @UDTMap annotations + * + * @return data type name of the key */ DataType.Name key(); @@ -147,6 +151,8 @@ public final class Types { * It supports only simple data type (not Collection, UDT or Tuple) * * In case if you need UDT value sub-type in the map, consider @UDTValueMap or @UDTMap annotations + * + * @return data type name of the value */ DataType.Name value(); @@ -192,6 +198,8 @@ public final class Types { * It supports only simple data type (not Collection, UDT or Tuple) * * In case if you need UDT sub-type in the set, consider @UDTSet annotation + * + * @return data type name of the value */ DataType.Name value(); @@ -213,6 +221,8 @@ public final class Types { /** * Class name of the custom user type that is implementation of the type + * + * @return class name of the custom type implementation */ String className(); @@ -273,6 +283,8 @@ public final class Types { * * In case if Java type is the model interface with @Tuple annotation then * all methods in this interface can have Types annotations that can be complex types as well. + * + * @return data type name sequence */ DataType.Name[] value() default {}; @@ -297,6 +309,8 @@ public final class Types { * * In case of Java type is the model interface with @UDT annotation then * this field is not using since model interface defines UserDefinedType with specific name + * + * @return UDT name */ String value() default ""; @@ -308,6 +322,8 @@ public final class Types { * forceQuote will add additional quotes around this name in all CQL queries. * * Default value is false. + * + * @return true if quotation is needed */ boolean forceQuote() default false; @@ -335,6 +351,8 @@ public final class Types { /** * Clarification of using the UDT data type as a key sub-type in the collection. + * + * @return annotation of UDT type */ UDT key(); @@ -344,6 +362,8 @@ public final class Types { * It supports only simple data type (not Collection, UDT or Tuple) * * In case if you need UDT value sub-type in the map, consider @UDTMap annotations + * + * @return data type name of the value */ DataType.Name value(); @@ -370,6 +390,8 @@ public final class Types { /** * Clarification of using the UDT data type as a sub-type in the collection. + * + * @return annotation of the UDT value */ UDT value(); @@ -397,12 +419,16 @@ public final class Types { /** * Clarification of using the UDT data type as a key sub-type in the collection. + * + * @return annotation of the UDT key */ UDT key(); /** * Clarification of using the UDT data type as a value sub-type in the collection. + * + * @return annotation of the UDT value */ UDT value(); @@ -430,6 +456,8 @@ public final class Types { /** * Clarification of using the UDT data type as a sub-type in the collection. + * + * @return annotation of the UDT value */ UDT value(); @@ -460,12 +488,16 @@ public final class Types { * It supports only simple data type (not Collection, UDT or Tuple) * * In case if you need UDT key sub-type in the map, consider @UDTMap annotations + * + * @return data type name of the key */ DataType.Name key(); /** * Clarification of using the UDT data type as a value sub-type in the collection. + * + * @return annotation of the UDT value */ UDT value();