mirror of
https://github.com/berkeleydb/libdb.git
synced 2024-11-16 17:16:25 +00:00
210 lines
8.1 KiB
HTML
210 lines
8.1 KiB
HTML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
|
||
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
|
||
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
|
||
<head>
|
||
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
|
||
<title>Isolation</title>
|
||
<link rel="stylesheet" href="gettingStarted.css" type="text/css" />
|
||
<meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.73.2" />
|
||
<link rel="start" href="index.html" title="Berkeley DB Programmer's Reference Guide" />
|
||
<link rel="up" href="transapp.html" title="Chapter 11. Berkeley DB Transactional Data Store Applications" />
|
||
<link rel="prev" href="transapp_atomicity.html" title="Atomicity" />
|
||
<link rel="next" href="transapp_read.html" title="Degrees of isolation" />
|
||
</head>
|
||
<body>
|
||
<div xmlns="" class="navheader">
|
||
<div class="libver">
|
||
<p>Library Version 11.2.5.2</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<table width="100%" summary="Navigation header">
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<th colspan="3" align="center">Isolation</th>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="transapp_atomicity.html">Prev</a> </td>
|
||
<th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 11.
|
||
Berkeley DB Transactional Data Store Applications
|
||
</th>
|
||
<td width="20%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="transapp_read.html">Next</a></td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
</table>
|
||
<hr />
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="sect1" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
|
||
<div class="titlepage">
|
||
<div>
|
||
<div>
|
||
<h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a id="transapp_inc"></a>Isolation</h2>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<p>The third reason listed for using transactions was <span class="emphasis"><em>isolation</em></span>.
|
||
Consider an application suite in which multiple threads of control
|
||
(multiple processes or threads in one or more processes) are changing
|
||
the values associated with a key in one or more databases. Specifically,
|
||
they are taking the current value, incrementing it, and then storing it
|
||
back into the database.</p>
|
||
<p>Such an application requires isolation. Because we want to change a value
|
||
in the database, we must make sure that after we read it, no other thread
|
||
of control modifies it. For example, assume that both thread #1 and
|
||
thread #2 are doing similar operations in the database, where thread #1
|
||
is incrementing records by 3, and thread #2 is incrementing records by
|
||
5. We want to increment the record by a total of 8. If the operations
|
||
interleave in the right (well, wrong) order, that is not what will
|
||
happen:</p>
|
||
<pre class="programlisting">thread #1 <span class="bold"><strong>read</strong></span> record: the value is 2
|
||
thread #2 <span class="bold"><strong>read</strong></span> record: the value is 2
|
||
thread #2 <span class="bold"><strong>write</strong></span> record + 5 back into the database (new value 7)
|
||
thread #1 <span class="bold"><strong>write</strong></span> record + 3 back into the database (new value 5)</pre>
|
||
<p>As you can see, instead of incrementing the record by a total of 8,
|
||
we've incremented it only by 3 because thread #1 overwrote thread #2's
|
||
change. By wrapping the operations in transactions, we ensure that this
|
||
cannot happen. In a transaction, when the first thread reads the
|
||
record, locks are acquired that will not be released until the
|
||
transaction finishes, guaranteeing that all writers
|
||
will block, waiting for the first thread's transaction to complete (or
|
||
to be aborted).</p>
|
||
<p>Here is an example function that does transaction-protected increments
|
||
on database records to ensure isolation:</p>
|
||
<pre class="programlisting">int
|
||
main(int argc, char *argv)
|
||
{
|
||
extern int optind;
|
||
DB *db_cats, *db_color, *db_fruit;
|
||
DB_ENV *dbenv;
|
||
int ch;
|
||
|
||
while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "")) != EOF)
|
||
switch (ch) {
|
||
case '?':
|
||
default:
|
||
usage();
|
||
}
|
||
argc -= optind;
|
||
argv += optind;
|
||
|
||
env_dir_create();
|
||
env_open(&dbenv);
|
||
|
||
/* Open database: Key is fruit class; Data is specific type. */
|
||
db_open(dbenv, &db_fruit, "fruit", 0);
|
||
|
||
/* Open database: Key is a color; Data is an integer. */
|
||
db_open(dbenv, &db_color, "color", 0);
|
||
|
||
/*
|
||
* Open database:
|
||
* Key is a name; Data is: company name, cat breeds.
|
||
*/
|
||
db_open(dbenv, &db_cats, "cats", 1);
|
||
|
||
add_fruit(dbenv, db_fruit, "apple", "yellow delicious");
|
||
|
||
<span class="bold"><strong> add_color(dbenv, db_color, "blue", 0);
|
||
add_color(dbenv, db_color, "blue", 3);</strong></span>
|
||
|
||
return (0);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
<span class="bold"><strong>int
|
||
add_color(DB_ENV *dbenv, DB *dbp, char *color, int increment)
|
||
{
|
||
DBT key, data;
|
||
DB_TXN *tid;
|
||
int fail, original, ret, t_ret;
|
||
char buf64;
|
||
|
||
/* Initialization. */
|
||
memset(&key, 0, sizeof(key));
|
||
key.data = color;
|
||
key.size = strlen(color);
|
||
memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
|
||
data.flags = DB_DBT_MALLOC;
|
||
|
||
for (fail = 0;;) {
|
||
/* Begin the transaction. */
|
||
if ((ret = dbenv->txn_begin(dbenv, NULL, &tid, 0)) != 0) {
|
||
dbenv->err(dbenv, ret, "DB_ENV->txn_begin");
|
||
exit (1);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/*
|
||
* Get the key. If it exists, we increment the value. If it
|
||
* doesn't exist, we create it.
|
||
*/
|
||
switch (ret = dbp->get(dbp, tid, &key, &data, DB_RMW)) {
|
||
case 0:
|
||
original = atoi(data.data);
|
||
break;
|
||
case DB_LOCK_DEADLOCK:
|
||
default:
|
||
/* Retry the operation. */
|
||
if ((t_ret = tid->abort(tid)) != 0) {
|
||
dbenv->err(dbenv, t_ret, "DB_TXN->abort");
|
||
exit (1);
|
||
}
|
||
if (fail++ == MAXIMUM_RETRY)
|
||
return (ret);
|
||
continue;
|
||
case DB_NOTFOUND:
|
||
original = 0;
|
||
break;
|
||
}
|
||
if (data.data != NULL)
|
||
free(data.data);
|
||
|
||
/* Create the new data item. */
|
||
(void)snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%d", original + increment);
|
||
data.data = buf;
|
||
data.size = strlen(buf) + 1;
|
||
|
||
/* Store the new value. */
|
||
switch (ret = dbp->put(dbp, tid, &key, &data, 0)) {
|
||
case 0:
|
||
/* Success: commit the change. */
|
||
if ((ret = tid->commit(tid, 0)) != 0) {
|
||
dbenv->err(dbenv, ret, "DB_TXN->commit");
|
||
exit (1);
|
||
}
|
||
return (0);
|
||
case DB_LOCK_DEADLOCK:
|
||
default:
|
||
/* Retry the operation. */
|
||
if ((t_ret = tid->abort(tid)) != 0) {
|
||
dbenv->err(dbenv, t_ret, "DB_TXN->abort");
|
||
exit (1);
|
||
}
|
||
if (fail++ == MAXIMUM_RETRY)
|
||
return (ret);
|
||
break;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}</strong></span></pre>
|
||
<p>The <a href="../api_reference/C/dbcget.html#dbcget_DB_RMW" class="olink">DB_RMW</a> flag in the <a href="../api_reference/C/dbget.html" class="olink">DB->get()</a> call specifies a write lock
|
||
should be acquired on the key/data pair, instead of the more obvious read
|
||
lock. We do this because the application expects to write the key/data
|
||
pair in a subsequent operation, and the transaction is much more likely to
|
||
deadlock if we first obtain a read lock and subsequently a write lock, than
|
||
if we obtain the write lock initially.</p>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="navfooter">
|
||
<hr />
|
||
<table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer">
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="transapp_atomicity.html">Prev</a> </td>
|
||
<td width="20%" align="center">
|
||
<a accesskey="u" href="transapp.html">Up</a>
|
||
</td>
|
||
<td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="transapp_read.html">Next</a></td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
<tr>
|
||
<td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">Atomicity </td>
|
||
<td width="20%" align="center">
|
||
<a accesskey="h" href="index.html">Home</a>
|
||
</td>
|
||
<td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> Degrees of isolation</td>
|
||
</tr>
|
||
</table>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</body>
|
||
</html>
|