WIP: more restructuring

This commit is contained in:
Scott Lystig Fritchie 2015-04-20 20:32:20 +09:00
parent 8481e23214
commit 9ab104933e

View file

@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ all members would be invalid and therefore would not move itself out
of wedged state. In very general terms, this requirement for a quorum of wedged state. In very general terms, this requirement for a quorum
majority of surviving participants is also a requirement for Paxos, majority of surviving participants is also a requirement for Paxos,
Raft, and ZAB. See Section~\ref{sec:split-brain-management} for a Raft, and ZAB. See Section~\ref{sec:split-brain-management} for a
proposal to handle ``split brain'' scenarios while in CPU mode. proposal to handle ``split brain'' scenarios while in CP mode.
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
@ -670,11 +670,13 @@ with epochs numbered by $E+\delta$ (where $\delta > 0$).
The distribution of the $E+\delta$ projections will bring all visible The distribution of the $E+\delta$ projections will bring all visible
participants into the new epoch $E+delta$ and then into consensus. participants into the new epoch $E+delta$ and then into consensus.
The remainder of this section follows the same pattern as The next portion of this section follows the same pattern as
Section~\ref{sec:phases-of-projection-change}: network monitoring, Section~\ref{sec:phases-of-projection-change}: network monitoring,
calculating new projections, writing projections, then perhaps calculating new projections, writing projections, then perhaps
adopting the newest projection (which may or may not be the projection adopting the newest projection (which may or may not be the projection
that we just wrote). that we just wrote).
Beginning with Section~9.5\footnote{TODO correction needed?}, we will
explore TODO topics.
\subsubsection{Aside: origin of the analogy to humming a song} \subsubsection{Aside: origin of the analogy to humming a song}