.. | ||
docs | ||
include | ||
src | ||
test | ||
.gitignore | ||
LICENSE | ||
Makefile | ||
README.md | ||
rebar.config.script |
Tango prototype TODO list
__ The current checkpoint implementation is fundamentally broken and needs a rewrite, or else. This issue is not mentioned at all in the Tango paper.
option 1: fix checkpoint to be 100% correct option 2: checkpointing is for the weak and the memory-constrained, so don't bother. Instead, rip out the current checkpoint code, period. option 3: other
xx Checkpoint fix option #1: history splicing within the same OID?
xx Checkpoint fix option #2: checkpoint to a new OID, history writes to both OIDs during the CP, then a marker in the old OID to switch over to the new OID?
History splicing has a flaw that I belive just won't work. The switch to a new OID has problems with updates written to the old OID before and before the new checkpoint has finished.
I believe that a checkpoint where: * all Tango writes, checkpoint and non-checkpoint alike, are noted with a checkpoint number. * that checkpoint number is strictly increasing * a new checkpoint has a new checkpoint number * scans ignore blocks with checkpoint numbers larger than the current active checkpoint #, until the checkpoint is complete.
... ought to work correctly.