mentat/db/src/metadata.rs

345 lines
15 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
// Copyright 2016 Mozilla
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use
// this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the
// License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed
// under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR
// CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
// specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.
#![allow(dead_code)]
//! Most transactions can mutate the Mentat metadata by transacting assertions:
//!
//! - they can add (and, eventually, retract and alter) recognized idents using the `:db/ident`
//! attribute;
//!
//! - they can add (and, eventually, retract and alter) schema attributes using various `:db/*`
//! attributes;
//!
//! - eventually, they will be able to add (and possibly retract) entid partitions using a Mentat
//! equivalent (perhaps :db/partition or :db.partition/start) to Datomic's `:db.install/partition`
//! attribute.
//!
//! This module recognizes, validates, applies, and reports on these mutations.
use std::collections::{BTreeMap, BTreeSet};
use std::collections::btree_map::Entry;
use add_retract_alter_set::{
AddRetractAlterSet,
};
use edn::symbols;
use entids;
use errors::{
ErrorKind,
Result,
ResultExt,
};
use mentat_core::{
attribute,
Entid,
Schema,
AttributeMap,
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
TypedValue,
ValueType,
};
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
use schema::{
AttributeBuilder,
AttributeValidation,
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
};
/// An alteration to an attribute.
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, Hash, Ord, PartialOrd, PartialEq)]
pub enum AttributeAlteration {
/// From http://blog.datomic.com/2014/01/schema-alteration.html:
/// - rename attributes
/// - rename your own programmatic identities (uses of :db/ident)
/// - add or remove indexes
Index,
/// - add or remove uniqueness constraints
Unique,
/// - change attribute cardinality
Cardinality,
/// - change whether history is retained for an attribute
NoHistory,
/// - change whether an attribute is treated as a component
IsComponent,
}
/// An alteration to an ident.
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, Hash, Ord, PartialOrd, PartialEq)]
pub enum IdentAlteration {
Ident(symbols::Keyword),
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
}
/// Summarizes changes to metadata such as a a `Schema` and (in the future) a `PartitionMap`.
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, Hash, Ord, PartialOrd, PartialEq)]
pub struct MetadataReport {
// Entids that were not present in the original `AttributeMap` that was mutated.
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
pub attributes_installed: BTreeSet<Entid>,
// Entids that were present in the original `AttributeMap` that was mutated, together with a
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
// representation of the mutations that were applied.
pub attributes_altered: BTreeMap<Entid, Vec<AttributeAlteration>>,
// Idents that were installed into the `AttributeMap`.
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
pub idents_altered: BTreeMap<Entid, IdentAlteration>,
}
impl MetadataReport {
pub fn attributes_did_change(&self) -> bool {
!(self.attributes_installed.is_empty() &&
self.attributes_altered.is_empty())
}
}
/// Update a `AttributeMap` in place from the given `[e a typed_value]` triples.
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
///
/// This is suitable for producing a `AttributeMap` from the `schema` materialized view, which does not
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
/// contain install and alter markers.
///
/// Returns a report summarizing the mutations that were applied.
pub fn update_attribute_map_from_entid_triples<A, R>(attribute_map: &mut AttributeMap, assertions: A, retractions: R) -> Result<MetadataReport>
where A: IntoIterator<Item=(Entid, Entid, TypedValue)>,
R: IntoIterator<Item=(Entid, Entid, TypedValue)> {
fn attribute_builder_to_modify(attribute_id: Entid, existing: &AttributeMap) -> AttributeBuilder {
existing.get(&attribute_id)
.map(AttributeBuilder::to_modify_attribute)
.unwrap_or_else(AttributeBuilder::default)
}
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
// Group mutations by impacted entid.
let mut builders: BTreeMap<Entid, AttributeBuilder> = BTreeMap::new();
// For retractions, we start with an attribute builder that's pre-populated with the existing
// attribute values. That allows us to check existing values and unset them.
for (entid, attr, ref value) in retractions.into_iter() {
let builder = builders.entry(entid).or_insert_with(|| attribute_builder_to_modify(entid, attribute_map));
match attr {
// You can only retract :db/unique, :db/doc, :db/isComponent; all others
// must be altered instead of retracted, or are not allowed to change.
entids::DB_DOC => {
// Nothing to do here; we don't keep docstrings inside `Attribute`s.
},
entids::DB_IS_COMPONENT => {
match value {
&TypedValue::Boolean(v) if builder.component == Some(v) => {
builder.component(false);
},
v => {
bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Attempted to retract :db/isComponent with the wrong value {:?}.", v)));
},
}
},
entids::DB_UNIQUE => {
match *value {
TypedValue::Ref(u) => {
match u {
entids::DB_UNIQUE_VALUE if builder.unique == Some(Some(attribute::Unique::Value)) => {
builder.non_unique();
},
entids::DB_UNIQUE_IDENTITY if builder.unique == Some(Some(attribute::Unique::Identity)) => {
builder.non_unique();
},
v => {
bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Attempted to retract :db/unique with the wrong value {}.", v)));
},
}
},
_ => bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Expected [:db/retract _ :db/unique :db.unique/_] but got [:db/retract {} :db/unique {:?}]", entid, value)))
}
},
_ => {
bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Retracting attribute {} for entity {} not permitted.", attr, entid)));
},
}
}
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
for (entid, attr, ref value) in assertions.into_iter() {
// For assertions, we can start with an empty attribute builder.
let builder = builders.entry(entid).or_insert_with(Default::default);
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
// TODO: improve error messages throughout.
match attr {
entids::DB_DOC => {
match *value {
TypedValue::String(_) => {},
_ => bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Expected [... :db/doc \"string value\"] but got [... :db/doc {:?}] for entid {} and attribute {}", value, entid, attr)))
}
},
entids::DB_VALUE_TYPE => {
match *value {
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_TYPE_BOOLEAN) => { builder.value_type(ValueType::Boolean); },
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_TYPE_DOUBLE) => { builder.value_type(ValueType::Double); },
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_TYPE_INSTANT) => { builder.value_type(ValueType::Instant); },
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_TYPE_KEYWORD) => { builder.value_type(ValueType::Keyword); },
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_TYPE_LONG) => { builder.value_type(ValueType::Long); },
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_TYPE_REF) => { builder.value_type(ValueType::Ref); },
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_TYPE_STRING) => { builder.value_type(ValueType::String); },
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_TYPE_UUID) => { builder.value_type(ValueType::Uuid); },
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
_ => bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Expected [... :db/valueType :db.type/*] but got [... :db/valueType {:?}] for entid {} and attribute {}", value, entid, attr)))
}
},
entids::DB_CARDINALITY => {
match *value {
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_CARDINALITY_MANY) => { builder.multival(true); },
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_CARDINALITY_ONE) => { builder.multival(false); },
_ => bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Expected [... :db/cardinality :db.cardinality/many|:db.cardinality/one] but got [... :db/cardinality {:?}]", value)))
}
},
entids::DB_UNIQUE => {
match *value {
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_UNIQUE_VALUE) => { builder.unique(attribute::Unique::Value); },
TypedValue::Ref(entids::DB_UNIQUE_IDENTITY) => { builder.unique(attribute::Unique::Identity); },
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
_ => bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Expected [... :db/unique :db.unique/value|:db.unique/identity] but got [... :db/unique {:?}]", value)))
}
},
entids::DB_INDEX => {
match *value {
TypedValue::Boolean(x) => { builder.index(x); },
_ => bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Expected [... :db/index true|false] but got [... :db/index {:?}]", value)))
}
},
entids::DB_FULLTEXT => {
match *value {
TypedValue::Boolean(x) => { builder.fulltext(x); },
_ => bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Expected [... :db/fulltext true|false] but got [... :db/fulltext {:?}]", value)))
}
},
entids::DB_IS_COMPONENT => {
match *value {
TypedValue::Boolean(x) => { builder.component(x); },
_ => bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Expected [... :db/isComponent true|false] but got [... :db/isComponent {:?}]", value)))
}
},
entids::DB_NO_HISTORY => {
match *value {
TypedValue::Boolean(x) => { builder.no_history(x); },
_ => bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Expected [... :db/noHistory true|false] but got [... :db/noHistory {:?}]", value)))
}
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
},
_ => {
bail!(ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Do not recognize attribute {} for entid {}", attr, entid)))
}
}
};
let mut attributes_installed: BTreeSet<Entid> = BTreeSet::default();
let mut attributes_altered: BTreeMap<Entid, Vec<AttributeAlteration>> = BTreeMap::default();
for (entid, builder) in builders.into_iter() {
match attribute_map.entry(entid) {
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
Entry::Vacant(entry) => {
// Validate once…
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
builder.validate_install_attribute()
.chain_err(|| ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Schema alteration for new attribute with entid {} is not valid", entid)))?;
// … and twice, now we have the Attribute.
let a = builder.build();
a.validate(|| entid.to_string())?;
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
entry.insert(builder.build());
attributes_installed.insert(entid);
},
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
Entry::Occupied(mut entry) => {
builder.validate_alter_attribute()
.chain_err(|| ErrorKind::BadSchemaAssertion(format!("Schema alteration for existing attribute with entid {} is not valid", entid)))?;
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
let mutations = builder.mutate(entry.get_mut());
attributes_altered.insert(entid, mutations);
},
}
}
Ok(MetadataReport {
attributes_installed: attributes_installed,
attributes_altered: attributes_altered,
idents_altered: BTreeMap::default(),
})
}
/// Update a `Schema` in place from the given `[e a typed_value added]` quadruples.
///
/// This layer enforces that ident assertions of the form [entid :db/ident ...] (as distinct from
/// attribute assertions) are present and correct.
///
/// This is suitable for mutating a `Schema` from an applied transaction.
///
/// Returns a report summarizing the mutations that were applied.
pub fn update_schema_from_entid_quadruples<U>(schema: &mut Schema, assertions: U) -> Result<MetadataReport>
where U: IntoIterator<Item=(Entid, Entid, TypedValue, bool)> {
// Group attribute assertions into asserted, retracted, and updated. We assume all our
// attribute assertions are :db/cardinality :db.cardinality/one (so they'll only be added or
// retracted at most once), which means all attribute alterations are simple changes from an old
// value to a new value.
let mut attribute_set: AddRetractAlterSet<(Entid, Entid), TypedValue> = AddRetractAlterSet::default();
let mut ident_set: AddRetractAlterSet<Entid, symbols::Keyword> = AddRetractAlterSet::default();
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
for (e, a, typed_value, added) in assertions.into_iter() {
// Here we handle :db/ident assertions.
if a == entids::DB_IDENT {
if let TypedValue::Keyword(ref keyword) = typed_value {
ident_set.witness(e, keyword.as_ref().clone(), added);
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
continue
} else {
// Something is terribly wrong: the schema ensures we have a keyword.
unreachable!();
}
}
attribute_set.witness((e, a), typed_value, added);
}
// Collect triples.
let retracted_triples = attribute_set.retracted.into_iter().map(|((e, a), typed_value)| (e, a, typed_value));
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
let asserted_triples = attribute_set.asserted.into_iter().map(|((e, a), typed_value)| (e, a, typed_value));
let altered_triples = attribute_set.altered.into_iter().map(|((e, a), (_old_value, new_value))| (e, a, new_value));
let report = update_attribute_map_from_entid_triples(&mut schema.attribute_map,
asserted_triples.chain(altered_triples),
retracted_triples)?;
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
let mut idents_altered: BTreeMap<Entid, IdentAlteration> = BTreeMap::new();
// Asserted, altered, or retracted :db/idents update the relevant entids.
for (entid, ident) in ident_set.asserted {
schema.entid_map.insert(entid, ident.clone());
schema.ident_map.insert(ident.clone(), entid);
idents_altered.insert(entid, IdentAlteration::Ident(ident.clone()));
}
for (entid, (old_ident, new_ident)) in ident_set.altered {
schema.entid_map.insert(entid, new_ident.clone()); // Overwrite existing.
schema.ident_map.remove(&old_ident); // Remove old.
schema.ident_map.insert(new_ident.clone(), entid); // Insert new.
idents_altered.insert(entid, IdentAlteration::Ident(new_ident.clone()));
}
for (entid, ident) in ident_set.retracted {
schema.entid_map.remove(&entid);
schema.ident_map.remove(&ident);
idents_altered.insert(entid, IdentAlteration::Ident(ident.clone()));
}
if report.attributes_did_change() {
schema.update_component_attributes();
}
Schema alteration. Fixes #294 and #295. (#370) r=rnewman * Pre: Don't retract :db/ident in test. Datomic (and eventually Mentat) don't allow to retract :db/ident in this way, so this runs afoul of future work to support mutating metadata. * Pre: s/VALUETYPE/VALUE_TYPE/. This is consistent with the capitalization (which is "valueType") and the other identifier. * Pre: Remove some single quotes from error output. * Part 1: Make materialized views be uniform [e a v value_type_tag]. This looks ahead to a time when we could support arbitrary user-defined materialized views. For now, the "idents" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e :db/ident :namespaced/keyword] and the "schema" materialized view is those datoms of the form [e a v] where a is in a particular set of attributes that will become clear in the following commits. This change is not backwards compatible, so I'm removing the open current (really, v2) test. It'll be re-instated when we get to https://github.com/mozilla/mentat/issues/194. * Pre: Map TypedValue::Ref to TypedValue::Keyword in debug output. * Part 3: Separate `schema_to_mutate` from the `schema` used to interpret. This is just to keep track of the expected changes during bootstrapping. I want bootstrap metadata mutations to flow through the same code path as metadata mutations during regular transactions; by differentiating the schema used for interpretation from the schema that will be updated I expect to be able to apply bootstrap metadata mutations to an empty schema and have things like materialized views created (using the regular code paths). This commit has been re-ordered for conceptual clarity, but it won't compile because it references the metadata module. It's possible to make it compile -- the functionality is there in the schema module -- but it's not worth the rebasing effort until after review (and possibly not even then, since we'll squash down to a single commit to land). * Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents. In order to support historical idents, we need to distinguish the "current" map from entid -> ident from the "complete historical" map ident -> entid. This is what Datomic does; in Datomic, an ident is never retracted (although it can be replaced). This approach is an important part of allowing multiple consumers to share a schema fragment as it migrates forward. This fixes a limitation of the Clojure implementation, which did not handle historical idents across knowledge base close and re-open. The "entids" materialized view is naturally a slice of the "datoms" table. The "idents" materialized view is a slice of the "transactions" table. I hope that representing in this way, and casting the problem in this light, might generalize to future materialized views. * Pre: Add DiffSet. * Part 4: Collect mutations to a `Schema`. I haven't taken your review comment about consuming AttributeBuilder during each fluent function. If you read my response and still want this, I'm happy to do it in review. * Part 5: Handle :db/ident and :db.{install,alter}/attribute. This "loops" the committed datoms out of the SQL store and back through the metadata (schema, but in future also partition map) processor. The metadata processor updates the schema and produces a report of what changed; that report is then used to update the SQL store. That update includes: - the materialized views ("entids", "idents", and "schema"); - if needed, a subset of the datoms themselves (as flags change). I've left a TODO for handling attribute retraction in the cases that it makes sense. I expect that to be straight-forward. * Review comment: Rename DiffSet to AddRetractAlterSet. Also adds a little more commentary and a simple test. * Review comment: Use ToIdent trait. * Review comment: partially revert "Part 2: Maintain entids separately from idents." This reverts commit 23a91df9c35e14398f2ddbd1ba25315821e67401. Following our discussion, this removes the "entids" materialized view. The next commit will remove historical idents from the "idents" materialized view. * Post: Use custom Either rather than std::result::Result. This is not necessary, but it was suggested that we might be paying an overhead creating Err instances while using error_chain. That seems not to be the case, but this change shows that we don't actually use any of the Result helper methods, so there's no reason to overload Result. This change might avoid some future confusion, so I'm going to land it anyway. Signed-off-by: Nick Alexander <nalexander@mozilla.com> * Review comment: Don't preserve historical idents. * Review comment: More prepared statements when updating materialized views. * Post: Test altering :db/cardinality and :db/unique. These tests fail due to a Datomic limitation, namely that the marker flag :db.alter/attribute can only be asserted once for an attribute! That is, [:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute] will only be transacted at most once. Since older versions of Datomic required the :db.alter/attribute flag, I can only imagine they either never wrote :db.alter/attribute to the store, or they handled it specially. I'll need to remove the marker flag system from Mentat in order to address this fundamental limitation. * Post: Remove some more single quotes from error output. * Post: Add assert_transact! macro to unwrap safely. I was finding it very difficult to track unwrapping errors while making changes, due to an underlying Mac OS X symbolication issue that makes running tests with RUST_BACKTRACE=1 so slow that they all time out. * Post: Don't expect or recognize :db.{install,alter}/attribute. I had this all working... except we will never see a repeated `[:db.part/db :db.alter/attribute :attribute]` assertion in the store! That means my approach would let you alter an attribute at most one time. It's not worth hacking around this; it's better to just stop expecting (and recognizing) the marker flags. (We have all the data to distinguish the various cases that we need without the marker flags.) This brings Mentat in line with the thrust of newer Datomic versions, but isn't compatible with Datomic, because (if I understand correctly) Datomic automatically adds :db.{install,alter}/attribute assertions to transactions. I haven't purged the corresponding :db/ident and schema fragments just yet: - we might want them back - we might want them in order to upgrade v1 and v2 databases to the new on-disk layout we're fleshing out (v3?). * Post: Don't make :db/unique :db.unique/* imply :db/index true. This patch avoids a potential bug with the "schema" materialized view. If :db/unique :db.unique/value implies :db/index true, then what happens when you _retract_ :db.unique/value? I think Datomic defines this in some way, but I really want the "schema" materialized view to be a slice of "datoms" and not have these sort of ambiguities and persistent effects. Therefore, to ensure that we don't retract a schema characteristic and accidentally change more than we intended to, this patch stops having any schema characteristic imply any other schema characteristic(s). To achieve that, I added an Option<Unique::{Value,Identity}> type to Attribute; this helps with this patch, and also looks ahead to when we allow to retract :db/unique attributes. * Post: Allow to retract :db/ident. * Post: Include more details about invalid schema changes. The tests use strings, so they hide the chained errors which do in fact provide more detail. * Review comment: Fix outdated comment. * Review comment: s/_SET/_SQL_LIST/. * Review comment: Use a sub-select for checking cardinality. This might be faster in practice. * Review comment: Put `attribute::Unique` into its own namespace.
2017-03-20 20:18:59 +00:00
Ok(MetadataReport {
idents_altered: idents_altered,
.. report
})
}