2016-07-05 18:47:28 +00:00
|
|
|
# How to contribute to Datomish
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This project is very new, so we'll probably revise these guidelines. Please
|
|
|
|
comment on a bug before putting significant effort in, if you'd like to
|
|
|
|
contribute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Follow the Style Guide (see below).
|
|
|
|
* Keep work branches in your own GitHub fork; rebase your own branches at will.
|
|
|
|
* Squash or rebase branches before merging to master so the commits make sense
|
|
|
|
on their own.
|
|
|
|
* Get a SGTM from someone relevant before merging.
|
|
|
|
* Keep commits to master bisect-safe (i.e., each commit should pass all tests).
|
|
|
|
* Sign-off commits before merging (see below).
|
|
|
|
* Make sure your commit message: references the issue or bug number, if there is
|
|
|
|
one; identifies the reviewers; and follows a readable style, with the long
|
|
|
|
description including any additional information that might help future
|
|
|
|
spelunkers (see below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Frobnicate the URL bazzer before flattening pilchard, r=mossop,rnewman. Fixes #6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The frobnication method used is as described in Podder's Miscellany, page 15.
|
|
|
|
Note that this pull request doesn't include tests, because we're bad people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Fork this repo at [github.com/mozilla/datomish](https://github.com/mozilla/datomish#fork-destination-box).
|
|
|
|
* Clone your fork locally. Make sure you use the correct clone URL.
|
|
|
|
```
|
2016-11-17 21:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
git clone git@github.com:YOURNAME/datomish.git
|
2016-07-05 18:47:28 +00:00
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Check your remotes:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
git remote --verbose
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Make sure you have an upstream remote defined:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
git remote add upstream https://github.com/mozilla/datomish
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Create a new branch to start working on a bug or feature:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b some-new-branch
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Do some work, making sure you signoff every commit:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
git commit --signoff --message "Some commit message"
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Rebase your work during development and before submitting a pull request,
|
|
|
|
avoiding merge commits, such that your commits are a logical sequence to
|
|
|
|
read rather than a record of your fevered typing.
|
|
|
|
* Make sure you're on the correct branch and are pulling from the correct upstream:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
git checkout some-new-branch
|
|
|
|
git pull upstream master --rebase
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Or using `git reset --soft` (as described in [a tale of three trees](http://www.infoq.com/presentations/A-Tale-of-Three-Trees))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Update your fork with the local changes on your branch:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
git push origin some-new-branch
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Submit a pull request. It would be helpful if you also flagged somebody
|
|
|
|
for review, by typing their `@username` in the comments section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Addressing review comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Adding more commits
|
|
|
|
After submitting a pull request, certain review comments might need to be
|
|
|
|
addressed. All you have to do is commit your new work, and simply update
|
|
|
|
your fork with the local changes on your branch again. The pull request
|
|
|
|
will automatically update with your new changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Signoff earlier commits
|
|
|
|
If you forgot to signoff some earlier commits, do an incremental rebase
|
|
|
|
on the branch you're working on. Find the earliest commit hash you want to
|
|
|
|
change, e.g., "1234567" (via `git log`), then use it in the rebase command
|
|
|
|
to start an interactive rebase. Type `edit` instead of `pick` for the
|
|
|
|
commits you want to edit.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
git rebase --interactive '1234567^'
|
|
|
|
git commit --amend --signoff --no-edit
|
|
|
|
git rebase --continue
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Squashing earlier commits
|
|
|
|
While you're working, committing often is a good idea. However, it might
|
|
|
|
not make sense to have commits that are too granular or don't make sense
|
|
|
|
on their own before closing a pull request and merging back to upstream master.
|
|
|
|
Find the earliest commit hash you want to change, e.g., "1234567"
|
|
|
|
(via `git log`), then use it in the rebase command to start an interactive
|
|
|
|
rebase. Type `squash` instead of `pick` for the commits you want to squash
|
|
|
|
into their parents.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
git rebase --interactive '1234567^'
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Properly set name and email
|
|
|
|
Update your `.gitconfig` with the proper information. You might need to
|
|
|
|
update the earlier commits and sign them off as well, see above.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
git config --global user.name "Foo Bar"
|
|
|
|
git config --global user.email john@doe.com
|
|
|
|
git commit --amend --reset-author --no-edit
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Style Guide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our JavaScript code follows the [airbnb style](https://github.com/airbnb/javascript)
|
|
|
|
with a [few exceptions](../../blob/master/.eslintrc). The precise rules are
|
|
|
|
likely to change a little as we get started so for now let eslint be your guide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our ClojureScript code follows… well, no guide so far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# How to sign-off your commits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To help tracking who did what, we have a "sign-off" procedure on patches. This
|
|
|
|
avoids the need for physically signed "[Committers|Contributors] License
|
|
|
|
Agreements".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the commit message, which certifies
|
|
|
|
that you wrote it or otherwise have the right to pass it on as an open-source
|
|
|
|
patch. The rules are pretty simple: if you can certify the below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
|
|
|
|
have the right to submit it under the open source license
|
|
|
|
indicated in the file; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
|
|
|
|
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
|
|
|
|
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
|
|
|
|
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
|
|
|
|
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
|
|
|
|
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
|
|
|
|
in the file; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
|
|
|
|
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
|
|
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
|
|
|
|
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
|
|
|
|
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
|
|
|
|
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
|
|
|
|
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
then you just add a line saying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you're using the command line, you can get this done automatically with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ git commit --signoff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some GUIs (e.g. SourceTree) have an option to automatically sign commits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to slightly modify patches you receive in order to merge them,
|
|
|
|
because the code is not exactly the same in your tree and the submitters'.
|
|
|
|
If you stick strictly to rule (c), you should ask the submitter to submit, but
|
|
|
|
this is a totally counter-productive waste of time and energy.
|
|
|
|
Rule (b) allows you to adjust the code, but then it is very impolite to change
|
|
|
|
one submitter's code and make them endorse your bugs. To solve this problem,
|
|
|
|
it is recommended that you add a line between the last Signed-off-by header and
|
|
|
|
yours, indicating the nature of your changes. While there is nothing mandatory
|
|
|
|
about this, it seems like prepending the description with your mail and/or name,
|
|
|
|
all enclosed in square brackets, is noticeable enough to make it obvious that
|
|
|
|
you are responsible for last-minute changes. Example :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
|
|
|
|
[lucky@maintainer.example.org: struct foo moved from foo.c to foo.h]
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Lucky K Maintainer <lucky@maintainer.example.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This practice is particularly helpful if you maintain a stable branch and
|
|
|
|
want at the same time to credit the author, track changes, merge the fix,
|
|
|
|
and protect the submitter from complaints. Note that under no circumstances
|
|
|
|
can you change the author's identity (the From header), as it is the one
|
|
|
|
which appears in the change-log.
|