greg/mentat
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 294 Pull requests Projects Releases 9 Packages Wiki Activity

Part 2: Get rid of {0, 1} -> {2, 3} mapping for added/added0. Fixes #28.

Browse source 
Now that we copying from tx_lookup_before -> tx_lookup_after, we don't
need to avoid duplicating rows.
This commit is contained in:
Nick Alexander 2016-09-06 14:56:29 -07:00
parent da1250d210
commit c46f0eb8ae
1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18
src/common/datomish/db.cljc
View file

@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
(apply str
"INSERT INTO temp.tx_lookup_after (e0, a0, v0, tx0, added0, value_type_tag0, sv, svalue_type_tag,
rid, e, a, v, tx, value_type_tag)
SELECT e, a, v, ?, 0 + 2, value_type_tag, v, value_type_tag,
SELECT e, a, v, ?, 0, value_type_tag, v, value_type_tag,
rowid, e, a, v, ?, value_type_tag
FROM datoms
WHERE "
@ -211,7 +211,7 @@
(apply str
"INSERT INTO temp.tx_lookup_after (e0, a0, v0, tx0, added0, value_type_tag0, sv, svalue_type_tag,
rid, e, a, v, tx, value_type_tag)
SELECT e, a, v, ?, 0 + 2, value_type_tag, v, value_type_tag,
SELECT e, a, v, ?, 0, value_type_tag, v, value_type_tag,
rowid, e, a, v, ?, value_type_tag
FROM datoms
WHERE "
@ -429,7 +429,7 @@
;; Second is slower, but still only one table walk: lookup old value by ea.
insert-into-tx-lookup
["INSERT INTO temp.tx_lookup_after
SELECT t.e0, t.a0, t.v0, t.tx0, t.added0 + 2, t.value_type_tag0, t.index_avet0, t.index_vaet0, t.index_fulltext0, t.unique_value0, t.sv, t.svalue_type_tag, d.rowid, d.e, d.a, d.v, d.tx, d.value_type_tag
SELECT t.e0, t.a0, t.v0, t.tx0, t.added0, t.value_type_tag0, t.index_avet0, t.index_vaet0, t.index_fulltext0, t.unique_value0, t.sv, t.svalue_type_tag, d.rowid, d.e, d.a, d.v, d.tx, d.value_type_tag
FROM temp.tx_lookup_before AS t
LEFT JOIN datoms AS d
ON t.e0 = d.e AND
@ -439,7 +439,7 @@
t.sv IS NOT NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT t.e0, t.a0, t.v0, t.tx0, t.added0 + 2, t.value_type_tag0, t.index_avet0, t.index_vaet0, t.index_fulltext0, t.unique_value0, t.sv, t.svalue_type_tag, d.rowid, d.e, d.a, d.v, d.tx, d.value_type_tag
SELECT t.e0, t.a0, t.v0, t.tx0, t.added0, t.value_type_tag0, t.index_avet0, t.index_vaet0, t.index_fulltext0, t.unique_value0, t.sv, t.svalue_type_tag, d.rowid, d.e, d.a, d.v, d.tx, d.value_type_tag
FROM temp.tx_lookup_before AS t,
datoms AS d
WHERE t.sv IS NULL AND
@ -450,13 +450,13 @@
["INSERT INTO transactions (e, a, v, tx, added, value_type_tag)
SELECT e0, a0, v0, ?, 1, value_type_tag0
FROM temp.tx_lookup_after
WHERE added0 IS 3 AND e IS NULL" tx] ;; TODO: get rid of magic value 3. XXX
WHERE added0 IS 1 AND e IS NULL" tx]
t-retract-datoms-carefully
["INSERT INTO transactions (e, a, v, tx, added, value_type_tag)
SELECT e, a, v, ?, 0, value_type_tag
FROM temp.tx_lookup_after
WHERE added0 IS 2 AND ((sv IS NOT NULL) OR (sv IS NULL AND v0 IS NOT v)) AND v IS NOT NULL" tx] ;; TODO: get rid of magic value 2. XXX
WHERE added0 IS 0 AND ((sv IS NOT NULL) OR (sv IS NULL AND v0 IS NOT v)) AND v IS NOT NULL" tx]
]
(go-pair
(doseq [q [build-indices insert-into-tx-lookup
@ -470,12 +470,12 @@
SELECT e0, a0, v0, ?, value_type_tag0,
index_avet0, index_vaet0, index_fulltext0, unique_value0
FROM temp.tx_lookup_after
WHERE added0 IS 3 AND e IS NULL" tx] ;; TODO: get rid of magic value 3. XXX
WHERE added0 IS 1 AND e IS NULL" tx]
;; TODO: retract fulltext datoms correctly.
d-retract-datoms-carefully
["WITH ids AS (SELECT l.rid FROM temp.tx_lookup_after AS l WHERE l.added0 IS 2 AND ((l.sv IS NOT NULL) OR (l.sv IS NULL AND l.v0 IS NOT l.v)))
DELETE FROM datoms WHERE rowid IN ids" ;; TODO: get rid of magic value 2. XXX
["WITH ids AS (SELECT l.rid FROM temp.tx_lookup_after AS l WHERE l.added0 IS 0 AND ((l.sv IS NOT NULL) OR (l.sv IS NULL AND l.v0 IS NOT l.v)))
DELETE FROM datoms WHERE rowid IN ids"
]]
(-run-queries conn [d-datoms-not-already-present d-retract-datoms-carefully]
"Transaction violates unique constraint")))