un-rollback -r1403. It was not the source of the assert failure.
This commit is contained in:
parent
bb904e85cf
commit
889311a303
1 changed files with 20 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -70,8 +70,7 @@ static inline int needFlush(stasis_buffer_manager_t * bm) {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static int chWriteBackPage_helper(stasis_buffer_manager_t* bm, pageid_t pageid, int is_hint) {
|
static int chWriteBackPage_helper(stasis_buffer_manager_t* bm, pageid_t pageid, int is_hint) {
|
||||||
stasis_buffer_concurrent_hash_t *ch = bm->impl;
|
stasis_buffer_concurrent_hash_t *ch = bm->impl;
|
||||||
hashtable_bucket_handle_t h;
|
Page * p = hashtable_lookup(ch->ht, pageid/*, &h*/);
|
||||||
Page * p = hashtable_lookup_lock(ch->ht, pageid, &h);
|
|
||||||
int ret = 0;
|
int ret = 0;
|
||||||
if(!p) {
|
if(!p) {
|
||||||
ret = ENOENT;
|
ret = ENOENT;
|
||||||
|
@ -81,15 +80,32 @@ static int chWriteBackPage_helper(stasis_buffer_manager_t* bm, pageid_t pageid,
|
||||||
ret = EBUSY;
|
ret = EBUSY;
|
||||||
p->needsFlush = 1; // Not atomic. Oh well.
|
p->needsFlush = 1; // Not atomic. Oh well.
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
if(p->id != pageid) { // it must have been written back...
|
||||||
|
unlock(p->loadlatch);
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
// Uggh. With the current design, it's possible that the trywritelock will block on the writeback thread.
|
// Uggh. With the current design, it's possible that the trywritelock will block on the writeback thread.
|
||||||
// That leaves us with few options, so we expose two sets of semantics up to the caller.
|
// That leaves us with few options, so we expose two sets of semantics up to the caller.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Since this isn't a hint, the page is not pinned. Therefore, the following will only deadlock if the caller is buggy.
|
// This used to call writelock while holding a hashtable bucket lock, risking deadlock if called when the page was pinned.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// We could assume that the caller knows what it's doing, and writeback regardless of whether the page is
|
||||||
|
// pinned. This could allow torn pages to reach disk, and would risk calling page compaction, etc while the
|
||||||
|
// page is concurrently read. However, it would prevent us from blocking on application pins. Unfortunately,
|
||||||
|
// compacting under during application reads is a deal breaker.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Instead, we release the hashtable lock, get the write latch, then double check the pageid.
|
||||||
|
// This is safe, since we know that page pointers are never freed, only reused. However, it causes writeback
|
||||||
|
// to block waiting for application threads to unpin their pages.
|
||||||
writelock(p->loadlatch,0);
|
writelock(p->loadlatch,0);
|
||||||
|
if(p->id != pageid) {
|
||||||
|
// someone else wrote it back. woohoo.
|
||||||
|
unlock(p->loadlatch);
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
hashtable_unlock(&h);
|
|
||||||
if(ret) { return ret; }
|
if(ret) { return ret; }
|
||||||
// write calls stasis_page_flushed(p);
|
// write calls stasis_page_flushed(p);
|
||||||
ch->page_handle->write(ch->page_handle, p);
|
ch->page_handle->write(ch->page_handle, p);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue