Commit graph

16 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
UENISHI Kota
e882f774ef Unify LevelDB usage to single instance
* Perfile LevelDB instance usage are changed to use single instance
  per FLU server.
* machi_csum_file reference is managed with machi_flu_filename_mgr
  as an aim to manage filenames with leveldb
* Not only chunk checksums, but the list of trimmed files are also
  stored in LevelDB.
* Remove 1024 bytes file header; instead put any metadata into
  LevelDB if needed.
* LevelDB `db_ref()` lifecycle is same as that of `machi_metadata_mgr`
* `machi_file_proxy` just uses it as it's passed at process startup
* There are several optimization space still left as it is

WIP
2016-02-09 13:36:25 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
befa776685 Fix several new bugs 2015-12-04 17:38:36 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
9f6b53fc15 Make bigger offset and a bit code cleanup 2015-11-18 14:38:04 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
e11cdfe95c Add stop and trim command to eqc_statem test on file_proxy 2015-11-18 14:11:25 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
81fae32539 Remove unused test function 2015-11-05 16:19:46 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
ce41f9005e Fix machi_file_proxy_eqc:write_post to proper assertion 2015-11-05 14:48:35 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
f56037240e Plan trim commands in eqc tests 2015-11-04 16:32:53 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
c1e5426034 Address PR comments 2015-11-04 16:08:09 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
3b087c0388 Add eqc trim tests to machi_file_proxy
* Add description on high client APIs
* Add notes to rethink high client specification
2015-11-04 16:02:29 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
f7358424e4 Trim command and GC prototype implementation
* maybe_gc/2 is triggered at machi_file_proxy, when chunk is deleted
  and the file is larger than `max_file_size`
* A file is deleted if all chunks except 1024 bytes header are trimmed
* If a file is going to be deleted, file_proxy notifies metadata_mgr
  to remember the filename persistently, whose filename is
  `known_files_<FluName>`
* Such trimmed filenames are stored in a machi_plist file per flu
* machi_file_proxy could not be started if the filename is in the
  manager's list. Consequently, any write, read and trim operations
  cannot happen against deleted file.
* After the file was trimmed, any read request to the file returns
  `{error, trimmed}`
* Disclaimer: no tests written yet and machi_plist does not support
  any recovery from partial writes.
* Add some thoughts as comments for repairing trims.

* State diagram of every byte is as follows:

```
state\action| write/append   | read_chunk       | trim_chunk
------------+----------------+------------------+---------------
 unwritten  |  -> written    | fail (+repair)   | -> trimmed
 written    | noop or repair | return content   | -> trimmed
 trimmed    |  fail          | fail             | noop
```
2015-10-28 12:34:03 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
3d6d4d8be3 Do the slicing in flu server rather than in CR client 2015-10-23 18:49:49 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
0f688d6279 Update read_chunk() PB protocol to return trimmed chunks 2015-10-22 23:11:43 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
a43397a7b8 Update to review comments 2015-10-21 10:58:00 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
ebb9bc3f5a Allow reading multiple chunks at once
* When repairing multiple chunks at once and any of its repair
  failed, the whole read request and repair work will fail
* Rename read_repair3 and read_repair4 to do_repair_chunks and
  do_repair chunk in machi_file_proxy
* This pull request changes return semantics of read_chunk(), that
  returns any chunk included in requested range
* First and last chunk may be cut to fit the requested range
* In machi_file_proxy, unwritten_bytes are removed and replaced by
  machi_csum_table
2015-10-20 17:59:09 +09:00
UENISHI Kota
3e975f53b8 Allow read_chunk() to return partial chunks
This is simply a change of read_chunk() protocol, where a response of
read_chunk() becomes list of written bytes along with checksum. All
related code including repair is changed as such. This is to pass all
tests and not actually supporting partial chunks.
2015-10-19 15:37:17 +09:00
Mark Allen
d3fe7ee181 Pull write-once files over to clean branch
I am treating the original write-once branch as a prototype
which I am now throwing away. I had too much work interleved
in there, so I felt like the best thing to do would be to cut
a new clean branch and pull the files over and start over
against a recent-ish master.

We will have to refactor the other things in FLU in a more
piecemeal fashion.
2015-10-02 16:29:09 -05:00