* Leave a pointer to issue 288.
* Re-export mentat_db::types::DB from mentat_db.
* Parse EDN strings in the query parser.
* Export 'public' API from mentat_query_parser's top level.
* Stub out mentat::q_once.
* Test the mentat_query directory on Travis.
* Export common types from edn.
This allows you to write
use edn::{PlainSymbol,Keyword};
instead of
use edn:🔣:{PlainSymbol,Keyword};
* Add an edn::Value::is_keyword predicate.
* Clean up query, preparing for query-parser.
* Make EDN keywords and symbols take Into<String> arguments.
* Implement parsing of simple :find lists.
* Rustfmt query-parser. Split find and query.
* Review comment: values_to_variables now returns a NotAVariableError on failure.
* Review comment: rename gimme to to_parsed_value.
* Review comment: add comments.
Starting to work out the project layout for sub-crates. The crate inside query-parser/ is "datomish-query-parser" and the core code in src/ depends on it.
This allows for code to run before and after a schema fragment is
added for the first time.
The anticipated use for this is twofold:
1. To do initial setup, e.g., defining global entities.
2. To 'adopt' unmanaged attributes already defined in the store.
This 'pre' would manually alter or retract attributes so that the
transact of the new schema datoms can complete.
For example, if properties :foo/bar and :foo/baz will be unchanged,
but :noo/zob needs to change from a string to an integer, the :none
pre-function can alter the ident, and the :none post-function can
migrate and clean up.
This generalizes the transactor loop to allow callers to run
an arbitrary function within an `in-transaction!` body.
Combined with exposing `<report-transact-tx-data!`, this allows
an admittedly sophisticated consumer to conditionally query and
transact in a consistent way -- for example, cleaning up inconsistent
data then transacting a new schema version.
Altering uniqueness and cardinality attributes works, with the exception
of enabling uniqueness from nothing.
:db/noHistory and :db/isComponent changes are implemented but untested,
and aren't really supported by Datomish anyway.
The metaphor we use is that of "evolution", where each "evolutionary
step" contains a number of different "generations". Entities in the
process of being resolved are increasingly "evolved" into simpler
generations, until no further evolution is possible.
The test would fail because we would have an [a v] pair with a string
value, but we were looking for the fulltext rowid in <avs. Using
all_datoms correctly looks up the string value, at the cost of crippling
the speed of <avs.
This sorts fulltext values inserted in a single transaction, not across
transactions. This makes the rowids assigned in the fulltext_values
table internally consistent, even as the order of entities and datoms
changes (as the transaction applying algorithm evolves over time). The
test changes simply make the fulltext values sort easily.
In theory, these fulltext values could be very large, and sorting might
be very expensive. In practice, we expect values to differ in their
first few characters, so that this is efficient (i.e., proportional to
the number of fulltext values inserted and not their size).
This uses a common table expression and multiple SQL calls rather than a
temporary table, since transactions with huge numbers of distinct
lookup-refs are likely to be very rare.
We mark lookup-refs with `lookup-ref`, which is a little awkward because
binding `(let [[a v] lookup-ref] ...)` doesn't directly work, but avoids
some ambiguity present in Datomic and DataScript around interpreting
lookup-refs as multiple value lists. (Which bit the tests in an earlier
version of this patch!)
There's no distinction made for fulltext attributes, since the values
found by the retractAttributes SELECT are already rowids into the
fulltext_values table and therefore need no additional mapping.
These temp files will almost certainly live in memory only, speeding our
test suite evaluation significantly. Before this patch, in a warmed
REPL environment I get:
Testing datomish.db-test
Ran 19 tests containing 97 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
"Elapsed time: 1408.720681 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 1343.986464 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 1338.660762 msecs"
After this patch, in a warmed REPL environment I get:
Testing datomish.db-test
Ran 19 tests containing 97 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
"Elapsed time: 587.605168 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 569.522333 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 589.080282 msecs"
We'd like this to be part of the query syntax itself, but doing so
requires extending DataScript's parser.
Instead we generalize our `args` to `options`, and take `:limit`
and `:order-by-vars`. The former must be an integer or nil, and the
latter is an array of `[var direction]` pairs.
This commit includes descriptive error messages and tests for success
and failure.
This caches a partition map per DB, which is helpful because it exposes
what the point in time DB partition state is, but is unhelpful because
the partition state can advance underneath the DB cache. This is
generally true of the approach -- this can happen to the ident/entid
maps, and the datoms themselves -- so we'll roll with it for now.
This reduces the number of SQL UPDATE operations from linear in the
number of id-literals used to constant in the number of known
partitions.
* Alter how clauses are concatenated. They now preserve order more accurately.
* Track mappings between vars and extracted type columns.
* Generate type code constraints.
* Push known types down into :not.
* Push known types down into :or.
* Tests and test fixes.
Note that `go` (and `go-pair`) don't descend into `for` comprehensions
and other situations in which a fn is created. This commit rewrites to
use nested `loop`s, and also improves use of `<av`.
* Batch up datoms into a smaller number of queries, improving transact speed by about 50%.
* Restore transacting FTS attributes.
* Implement retraction of freetext datoms.
This is almost complete; it passes the test suite save for retracting
fulltext datoms correctly.
There's a lot to say about this approach, but I don't have time to give
too many details. The broad outline is as follows. We collect datoms
to add and retract in a tx_lookup table. Depending on flags ("search
value" sv and "search value type tag" svalue_type_tag) we "complete" the
tx_lookup table by joining matching datoms. This allows us to find
datoms that are present (and should not be added as part of the
transaction, or should be retracted as part of the transaction, or
should be replaced as part of the transaction. We complete the
tx_lookup (in place!) in two separate INSERTs to avoid a quadratic
two-table walk (explain the queries to observe that both INSERTs walk
the lookup table once and then use the datoms indexes to complete the
matching values).
We could simplify the code by using multiple lookup tables, both for the
two cases of search parameters (eav vs. ea) and for the incomplete and
completed rows. Right now we differentiate the former with NULL checks,
and the latter by incrementing the added0 column. It performs well
enough, so I haven't tried to understand the performance of separating
these things.
After the tx_lookup table is completed, we build the transaction from
it; and update the datoms materialized view table as well. Observe the
careful handling of the "search value" sv parameters to handle replacing
:db.cardinality/one datoms.
Finally, we read the processed transaction back to produce to the API.
This is strictly to match the Datomic API; we might make allow to skip
this, since many consumers will not want to stream this over the wire.
Rough timings show the transactor processing a single >50k datom
transaction in about 3.5s, of which less than 0.5s is spent in the
expensive joins. Further, repeating the processing of the same
transaction is only about 3.5s again! That's the worst possible for the
joins, since every single inserted datom will already be present in the
database, making the most expensive join match every row.
This was a little more tricky than might be expected because the
initialization process uses the transactor to bootstrap the database.
Since Clojure doesn't accept mutually recursive modules, this
necessitated a third module, namely "db-factory", which uses both "db"
and "transact". While I was here, I started an "api" module, to paper
over the potentially complicated internal module structure for external
consumers. In time, this "api" module may also grow CLJS-specific JS
transformations.
